But there is a downside any specks of dust or damage to the disc can be heard as noise or static.
Are vinyls better quality than cds.
But one of the issues too when people say well i have this on cd and i have it on vinyl and the vinyl just sounds so much better it may not be an apples to apples comparison because the flip.
From a technical standpoint digital cd audio quality is clearly superior to vinyl.
Cds have a better signal to noise ratio i e.
So no vinyl isn t better than digital music but it offers several advantages because of the fact that loudness war mixing isn t feasible on the medium.
Playback and inconsistencies though cd s sample rate is high and we re all well aware how good they sound the idea of its being converted once into digital and then back to analogue losing and approximating information seems to infer it will always be inferior to vinyl.
This means that the waveforms from a vinyl recording can be much more accurate and that can be heard in the richness of the sound.
On a theoretical level there s just no reason it should be the case that vinyl sounds better.
The difference between the loudest and softest sounds an lp can play is about 70 decibels db.
Cds can handle over 90 db.
In practical terms this means that cds have more than 10 times the.
Cd quality sits somewhere in the middle with 44 100 samples per second at 16 bit accuracy.
There is less interference from hissing turntable rumble etc better stereo channel separation and have no variation in playback speed.
Cds can handle over 90 db.
There are built in problems with using vinyl as a data encoding mechanisms that have no cd equivalent.